I welcome the decision by the National Anti-Corruption Commission to reconsider its original decision not to investigate individuals referred by the Royal Commission into Robodebt.

I also welcome the report from the Inspector of the NACC Gail Furness, which found that the NACC Commissioner’s decision to remain involved in the process which led to a decision not to pursue an investigation into Robodebt referral was a mistake, given that he had a declared conflict of interest because of a longstanding personal connection to the person referred.

It is vital that the National Anti-Corruption Commission is independent and free from influence in carrying out its duties. In providing such independence, the NACC has significant powers, and therefore it is also vital that the Commission itself is subject to robust oversight. This is provided through an Inspector and a Parliamentary oversight committee. 

The powers of the Inspector to undertake such an investigation, and make such findings, in relation to officer misconduct were the subject of evidence to the Joint Select Committee which examined the original legislation. The powers and findings of the Inspector in this matter were made possible by amendments moved by the Greens to the Bill in the Senate in 2022. 

Today’s report highlights the powerful role which is played by the committee process and the crossbench when suggestions and amendments are taken in good faith to the government.

The investigation and findings by the Inspector mean accountability and scrutiny of decisions made by the Commission can be provided without the political pressure or under direction from the Government. This must always remain so.

It is in my efforts to protect the independence of the Commission, and in respect to my role as Deputy Chair of the parliamentary committee with oversight functions of the NACC, that I rarely comment publicly on the decisions made by the NACC.

The Robodebt scandal is one of the worst examples of public maladministration in Australia’s history, and there must be accountability for those involved. It is time that the sealed section of the Royal Commission report was made public.

ENDS